Love v. RGS Financial, Inc.
| Monica Love |
| RGS Financial, Inc. |
| 0:2021cv00383 |
| February 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Nancy E Brasel |
| Elizabeth Cowan Wright |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright: Initial Pretrial Conference held on 4/5/2021. The parties are directed to continue their settlement discussions and file a letter on CM/ECF on or before April 19, 2021 stating (1) whether their discussions have resulted in a settlement and (2) if they have not settled the case, whether they request a continued Rule 16 conference or that the Court issue a scheduling order based on the Rule 26(f) report. (TMA) |
| Filing 8 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. Filed by RGS Financial, Inc.. Jointly Signed by Plaintiff Monica Love.(Kreidler, Michael) |
Filing 7
ORDER/NOTICE: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 3/29/2021. Pretrial Conference set for 4/5/2021 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 2/18/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(TMA)
|
| Filing 6 Defendant RGS Financial, Inc.'s ANSWER to Complaint filed by RGS Financial, Inc.. (Kreidler, Michael) |
| Filing 5 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Nancy E. Brasel per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. Please use case number 21-cv-383 NEB/ECW. (CLK) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by RGS Financial, Inc. re #3 Notice of Appearance, #2 Rule 7.1 - Disclosure Statement, #1 Notice of Removal, (Kreidler, Michael) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael S Kreidler on behalf of RGS Financial, Inc.. (Kreidler, Michael) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Defendant RGS Financial, Inc.. (Kreidler, Michael) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hennepin County, case number 27-CV-21-1621 (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-8479435) filed by RGS Financial, Inc.. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit(s) B Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Kreidler, Michael) Modified text on 2/10/2021 (CLK). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Love v. RGS Financial, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Monica Love | |
| Represented By: | Kimberly S Moen Zillig |
| Represented By: | Andrew C Walker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: RGS Financial, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Michael S Kreidler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
