Mohamed et al v. Mayorkas et al
Ladan Suleyman Mohamed, Nadia Haji Mohamed and Abdulrizak Haji |
Leslie Tritten, Tracy Renaud and Alejandro Mayorkas |
0:2021cv00670 |
March 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Tony N Leung |
Patrick J Schiltz |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 6 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #5 Stipulation. (Repp, Liles) |
Filing 5 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT by Alejandro Mayorkas, Tracy Renaud, Leslie Tritten. Jointly Signed by LADAN SULEYMAN MOHAMED, NADIA HAJI MOHAMED;, and ABDULRIZAK HAJI. (Repp, Liles) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Liles Harvey Repp on behalf of Alejandro Mayorkas, Tracy Renaud, Leslie Tritten. (Repp, Liles) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Alejandro Mayorkas, Tracy Renaud, Leslie Tritten. (MKB) |
Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Patrick J. Schiltz per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. Please use case number 21-cv-670 (PJS/TNL). (MKB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-8581736) filed by Ladan Suleyman Mohamed, Abdulrizak Haji, Nadia Haji Mohamed. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Prokosch, Marc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.