Josephs v. Marzan et al
| Michaleen Josephs |
| Press Media Group, Inc. doing business as VumaTV and Alberto Jose Marzan |
| 0:2021cv00749 |
| March 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| David T Schultz |
| John R Tunheim |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR - WILL REFILE - AFFIDAVIT in Support re #5 Application for Entry of Default . (Fisher, Caitlinrose) Modified text on 5/20/2021 (MMP).
|
|
Filing 5
APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT . (Fisher, Caitlinrose)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michaleen Josephs. Alberto Jose Marzan served on 4/15/2021, answer due 5/6/2021; Press Media Group, Inc. served on 4/15/2021, answer due 5/6/2021. (Fisher, Caitlinrose)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to Alberto Jose Marzan, Press Media Group, Inc. (CLK)
|
|
Filing 2
TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Chief Judge John R. Tunheim per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 21-cv-749 JRT/DTS. (CLK)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT Alberto Jose Marzan, Press Media Group, Inc. (filing fee $402, receipt number AMNDC-8614896) filed by Michaleen Josephs. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A-C, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Forsgren, Matthew) Modified text on 3/22/2021 (lmb).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
