Hodge v. Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board et al
| Jenice S. Hodge |
| Officer Calvin Pham and Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board |
| 0:2021cv00997 |
| April 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Tony N Leung |
| Wilhelmina M Wright |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Confidential Letter to Court due by 1/3/2022. Settlement Conference set for 1/20/2022 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9W (MPLS) before Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 6/8/2021. (HAM)
|
|
Filing 10
PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 10/1/2021. Fact Discovery due by 3/1/2022. Expert Discovery due by 7/1/2022. Motions (non-disp) due 3/1/2022. Motions (disp) due by 9/1/2022. Ready for trial due by 1/15/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 6/8/2021. (HAM)
|
| Filing 9 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung: Initial Pretrial Conference held on 6/4/2021. Pretrial scheduling order will be issued. (HAM) |
| Filing 8 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. Filed by Jenice S. Hodge. Jointly Signed by Minneapolis Park Board and Officer Pham.(Leyderman, Zorislav) |
|
Filing 7
(Text-Only) ORDER/NOTICE TO ATTORNEY. In recognition of the current efforts locally and nationally to protect persons from unnecessary potential exposure to COVID-19, the Pretrial Scheduling Conference in this case will be held by telephone. A call-in number will be provided by the Court. The parties are not required to conduct any applicable meet and confers in person. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 4/30/2021. (HAM)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF AND ORDER FOR PRETRIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Pretrial Conference set for 6/4/2021 at 10:00 AM in Judge's Chambers 9W (MPLS) before Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 4/23/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (HAM)
|
| Filing 5 Defendants' ANSWER to Complaint filed by Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board, Calvin Pham. (Mosley, Alana) |
| Filing 4 (Text-Only) NOTICE - Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright's Practice Pointers are available on the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota's #website. All parties are expected to be familiar with and adhere to these Practice Pointers, including Judge Wright's deviations from the Local Rules with respect to motion scheduling and briefing deadlines. (RJE) |
| Filing 3 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright per Civil (3rd, 4th - Civil Rights) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. Please use case number 21-cv-997 WMW/TNL. (CLK) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET re #1 Notice of Removal,, filed by Jenice S. Hodge filed by Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board, Calvin Pham. (Mosley, Alana) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Fourth Judicial District, District Court, (filing fee $402, receipt number AMNDC-8684618) filed by Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board, Calvin Pham. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint, #2 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal , #3 Affidavit of Service, #4DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR. WILL REFILE. Civil Cover Sheet) (Mosley, Alana) Modified text on 4/15/2021 (CLK). Modified text on 4/16/2021 (lmb). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
