Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research v. Knowledge to Practice, Inc.
| Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research |
| Knowledge to Practice, Inc. |
| 0:2021cv01039 |
| April 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Katherine M Menendez |
| Susan Richard Nelson |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
(Text-only) ORDER: The MOTION to SEAL #1 Complaint And Exhibit A to Complaint [ECF No. 3] is provisionally granted. Counsel for the parties are directed to meet and confer within the next 14 days regarding the propriety of keeping the unredacted complaint and attachment A thereto under seal. On or before 6/25/2021, the parties shall advise the undersigned Magistrate Judge of the results of their discussions, including whether they have any disagreement about the confidentiality of the redacted portions of the complaint or the entirety of attachment A. If the parties agree that the unredacted complaint and attachment A should remain under seal, they should so advise the Court in a joint letter of no more than three pages, including citations to any relevant legal authority. If the parties disagree as to the proper treatment of the unredacted complaint or attachment A, they shall set forth their positions in separate letters of no more than three pages, including citations to any relevant legal authority. These letters need not be filed on ECF, but if the parties prefer that they be part of the electronic record, they may do so. In any event, the parties' joint or separate letters must be sent to the undersigned Magistrate Judge at the following email address: menendez_chambers@mnd.uscourts.gov. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 6/11/2021. (JEN)
|
|
Filing 14
(Text-Only) ORDER granting #12 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Knowledge to Practice, Inc. answer due 6/28/2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 5/24/2021. (KAT)
|
|
Filing 13
PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #12 Stipulation. (Zeuli, Anthony)
|
|
Filing 12
STIPULATION re #1 Complaint, For Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Knowledge to Practice, Inc.. Jointly Signed by Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. (Zeuli, Anthony)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Appearance by Elisabeth Muirhead on behalf of Knowledge to Practice, Inc.. (Muirhead, Elisabeth)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Appearance by Gregory C Golla on behalf of Knowledge to Practice, Inc.. (Golla, Gregory)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Appearance by Anthony R Zeuli on behalf of Knowledge to Practice, Inc.. (Zeuli, Anthony)
|
|
Filing 8
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Knowledge to Practice, Inc. served on 5/4/2021, answer due 5/25/2021. (Brantingham, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 7
Summons Issued as to Knowledge to Practice, Inc. (MTP)
|
|
Filing 6
TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Susan Richard Nelson per Civil (3rd/4th Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. Please use case number 21-cv-01039 SRN/KMM. (MTP)
|
|
Filing 5
RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Plaintiff Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. (Brantingham, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 4
PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Leave File Complaint and Exhibit Under Seal #3 Motion to Seal Document. (Brantingham, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to SEAL #1 Complaint, And Exhibit A to Complaint filed by Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. (Brantingham, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 2
REDACTED COMPLAINT for #1 Sealed Complaint . (Attachments: #1 STATEMENT INSTEAD OF REDACTED DOCUMENT: Entire Document Confidential for #1 Exhibit A. #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Brantingham, Andrew) Modified text on 4/23/2021 (MTP).
|
|
Filing 1
SEALED COMPLAINT against Knowledge to Practice, Inc. (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-8701635) filed by Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Brantingham, Andrew)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research v. Knowledge to Practice, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research | |
| Represented By: | Alan J Iverson |
| Represented By: | Andrew B Brantingham |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Knowledge to Practice, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Gregory C Golla |
| Represented By: | Elisabeth Muirhead |
| Represented By: | Anthony R Zeuli |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
