Geographic Location Innovations, LLC v. Evereve Incorporated
| Geographic Location Innovations LLC and Geographic Location Innovations, LLC |
| Evereve Incorporated |
| 0:2021cv01048 |
| April 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Hildy Bowbeer |
| Wilhelmina M Wright |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 REPORT ON DETERMINATION OF PATENT/TRADEMARK ACTION (AO 120)(USPTO noticed with filing.) (lmb) |
| Filing 15 REPORT ON FILING OF PATENT/TRADEMARK ACTION (AO 120)(USPTO noticed with filing). (Robbennolt, Paul) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Geographic Location Innovations, LLC (Robbennolt, Paul) |
Filing 13
ORDER granting #11 Unopposed Motion to Extend Defendant's Deadline to Move, Answer, or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Evereve Incorporated answer due 6/18/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer on 5/10/2021. (LNP)
|
| Filing 12 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #11 Motion for Extension of Time (General). (Conner, Clint) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to Move, Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint (UNOPPOSED) filed by Evereve Incorporated. (Conner, Clint) Modified event type on 5/10/2021 (LNP). |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Clint Conner on behalf of Evereve Incorporated. (Conner, Clint) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Geographic Location Innovations, LLC. Evereve Incorporated served on 4/28/2021, answer due 5/19/2021. (Padmanabhan, Devan) |
|
Filing 8
TEXT ONLY ENTRY: ORDER granting #7 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Jay Brett Johnson for Geographic Location Innovations, LLC. Approved by Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer on 4/30/2021. (NAH)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Jay Johnson. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-8713577 filed by Geographic Location Innovations, LLC. (Padmanabhan, Devan) |
| Filing 6 (Text-Only) NOTICE - Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer's Practice Pointers, which have been recently revised, are available on the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota's #website. All parties are expected to be familiar with and adhere to these Practice Pointers, including any variances from Local Rules. (LNP) |
| Filing 5 (Text-Only) NOTICE - Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright's Practice Pointers are available on the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota's #website. All parties are expected to be familiar with and adhere to these Practice Pointers, including Judge Wright's deviations from the Local Rules with respect to motion scheduling and briefing deadlines. (RJE) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Evereve Incorporated. (MMP) |
| Filing 3 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright per 3rd 4th Patent list, referred to Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer. Please use case number 21-cv-1048 (WMW/HB). (MMP) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary reported for Plaintiff Geographic Location Innovations LLC. (Robbennolt, Paul) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Evereve Incorporated (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-8703157) filed by Geographic Location Innovations LLC. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A (U.S,. Patent No. 7,917,285), #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Robbennolt, Paul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
