McDonald v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
| Matthew McDonald |
| Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LP, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. and Syngenta Seeds, LLC |
| 0:2021cv01065 |
| April 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Hildy Bowbeer |
| David S Doty |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE:Case transferred from Minnesota has been opened in Southern District of Illinois as case 3:21-pq-00642, filed 06/21/2021. (kt) |
| Filing 17 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE: This case has been transferred/extracted to the Southern District of Illinois. (kt) |
| Filing 16 CERTIFIED COPY OF CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-1) transferring case to the Southern District of Illinois per the MDL Panel for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. Case assigned to Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel.(kt) |
Filing 15
ORDER on (11 in 0:21-cv-01066-DSD-HB) Stipulation, (12 in 0:21-cv-01113-DSD-HB) Stipulation, (13 in 0:21-cv-01063-DSD-HB) Stipulation, (13 in 0:21-cv-01068-DSD-HB) Stipulation, (14 in 0:21-cv-01107-DSD-HB) Stipulation, (13 in 0:21-cv-01111-DSD-HB) Stipulation, (13 in 0:21-cv-01109-DSD-HB) Stipulation, (11 in 0:21-cv-01108-DSD-HB) Stipulation, (13 in 0:21-cv-01106-DSD-HB) Stipulation, (11 in 0:21-cv-01109-DSD-HB) Stipulation, (14 in 0:21-cv-01064-DSD-HB) Stipulation, (12 in 0:21-cv-01064-DSD-HB) Stipulation, (19 in 0:21-cv-01061-DSD-HB) Stipulation, (13 in 0:21-cv-01108-DSD-HB) Stipulation, (11 in 0:21-cv-01065-DSD-HB) Stipulation, (13 in 0:21-cv-01066-DSD-HB) Stipulation, (14 in 0:21-cv-01112-DSD-HB) Stipulation, (12 in 0:21-cv-01067-DSD-HB) Stipulation, (12 in 0:21-cv-01107-DSD-HB) Stipulation, (11 in 0:21-cv-01111-DSD-HB) Stipulation, (14 in 0:21-cv-01113-DSD-HB) Stipulation, (11 in 0:21-cv-01063-DSD-HB) Stipulation, (11 in 0:21-cv-01062-DSD-HB) Stipulation, (11 in 0:21-cv-01067-DSD-HB) Stipulation, (13 in 0:21-cv-01062-DSD-HB) Stipulation, (13 in 0:21-cv-01065-DSD-HB) Stipulation, (12 in 0:21-cv-01112-DSD-HB) Stipulation, (17 in 0:21-cv-01061-DSD-HB) Stipulation, (11 in 0:21-cv-01106-DSD-HB) Stipulation, (11 in 0:21-cv-01068-DSD-HB) Stipulation. Signed by Judge David S. Doty on 5/24/2021.Associated Cases: 0:21-cv-01061-DSD-HB et al.(DLO)
|
| Filing 14 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #13 Stipulation. (Gustafson, Daniel) |
| Filing 13 STIPULATION for Stay Pending Potential Transfer of This Action by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation by Matthew McDonald. Jointly Signed by Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG, and Syngenta Seeds, LLC. (Gustafson, Daniel) |
| Filing 12 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #11 Stipulation. (Gustafson, Daniel) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION for Stay Pending Potential Transfer of This Action by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation by Matthew McDonald. Jointly Signed by Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LP. (Gustafson, Daniel) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT OF RELATED CASES. Case reassigned to Judge David S. Doty and Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer for all further proceedings. Judge Michael J. Davis, Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung no longer assigned to case. NOTE: the new case number is 21-cv-1065 DSD/HB. Please use this case number for all subsequent pleadings. Signed by Judge David S. Doty, Judge Nancy E. Brasel, Judge Patrick J. Schiltz, Judge Susan Richard Nelson, Judge Eric C. Tostrud, Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on May 10, 2021, and by Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright, Judge Michael J. Davis and Judge Donovan W. Frank on May 11, 2021. (kt)
|
| Filing 9 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #5 MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by Matthew McDonald.(Gustafson, Daniel) |
| Filing 8 MEET and CONFER STATEMENT re #5 Motion to Consolidate Cases filed by Matthew McDonald.(Gustafson, Daniel) |
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Support re #5 MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by Matthew McDonald. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Gustafson, Daniel) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION #5 MOTION to Consolidate Cases : Date and time to be determined. (Gustafson, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by Matthew McDonald. (Gustafson, Daniel) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Matthew McDonald. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, served 4/30/2021, answer due 05/21/2021; Syngenta AG served 4/30/2021, answer due 05/21/2021; Syngenta Seeds, LLC, served 4/30/2021, answer due 05/21/2021; Chevron U.S.A., Inc. served 5/3/2021, answer due 05/24/2021; Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LP served 4/30/2021, answer due 05/21/2021. (Williams, Amanda) Modified text on 5/6/2021 (lmb). |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LP, Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta Seeds, LLC. (kt) |
| Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Michael J. Davis per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. Please use case number 21-cv-1065 MJD/TNL. (kt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-8706821) filed by Matthew McDonald. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Gustafson, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
