Prager v. United States Internal Revenue Service, The et al
| Jeff Prager |
| United States Internal Revenue Service, The, Jane Doe and John Doe |
| 0:2021cv01114 |
| April 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Nancy E Brasel |
| Becky R Thorson |
| Taxes |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson on 4/29/2021. (MSK)
|
| Filing 4 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or otherwise Respond to the Complaint filed by United States Internal Revenue Service, The.(Cohen, Priyanka) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or otherwise Respond to the Complaint filed by United States Internal Revenue Service, The. (Cohen, Priyanka) |
| Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Nancy E. Brasel per 3rd, 4th - Federal Tax Suits list, referred to Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. Please use case number 21-cv-1114 (NEB/BRT). (KNK) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hennepin County District Court- Fourth Judicial District filed by The United States. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint, #2 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Cohen, Priyanka) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
