Perkins v. Trump, Sr. et al
| Victor B. Perkins |
| John Ashcroft, Mr. Barack Obama, Mr. William J. Clinton, Mr. Donald J. Trump, Sr., Mr. George W. Bush, Jeff Session, William Barr, Loretta Lynch and Eric H. Holder |
| 0:2021cv01219 |
| May 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Tony N Leung |
| John R Tunheim |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 OBJECTION TO #3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION filed by Victor B. Perkins. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(MMG) Document QC'd on 6/23/2021 (MTP). |
| Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and #2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Victor B. Perkins. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 6/3/2021. (EB) |
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Victor B. Perkins. (Attachments: #1 Attachment: Inmate Inquiry)(NAH) Document QC'd on 5/26/2021 (MMG). |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Victor B. Perkins. Case assigned to Judge John R. Tunheim per 3rd/4th Prisoner list, referred to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A-C, #2 Attachment 1, #3 Cover Letter, #4 Affidavit of Service, #5 Envelope) (NAH) Document QC'd on 5/26/2021 (MMG). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
