Retire Young, Inc. et al v. Fiserv, Inc.
Retire Young, Inc., Kevin Young and Retire Young, Inc. doing business as Online Trading Academy Minneapolis |
Fiserv, Inc. and Fiserv, Inc. doing business as CardConnect |
0:2021cv01224 |
May 14, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Nancy E Brasel |
Katherine M Menendez |
Assault Libel & Slander |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ORDER on #16 Stipulation. The Plaintiff's response to the motion to dismiss is due on 7/28/21. The reply shall be due on 8/11/21. Signed by Judge Nancy E. Brasel on 7/9/2021.(KMW) |
Filing 17 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #16 Stipulation. (Moss, Carol) |
Filing 16 STIPULATION to Amend Briefing Schedule by Retire Young, Inc., Kevin Young. Jointly Signed by Fiserv, Inc., d/b/a CardConnect. (Moss, Carol) |
Filing 15 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Fiserv, Inc. re #14 Proposed Order to Judge, #12 Meet and Confer Statement, #13 Notice of Hearing on Motion, #10 MOTION to Dismiss/General Plaintiffs' Complaint, #11 Memorandum in Support of Motion, (Knapp, Christopher) |
Filing 14 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #10 MOTION to Dismiss/General Plaintiffs' Complaint filed by Fiserv, Inc..(Knapp, Christopher) |
Filing 13 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION #10 MOTION to Dismiss/General Plaintiffs' Complaint : Motion Hearing set for 9/15/2021 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3A (STP) before Judge Nancy E. Brasel. (Knapp, Christopher) |
Filing 12 MEET and CONFER STATEMENT re #10 Motion to Dismiss/General filed by Fiserv, Inc..(Knapp, Christopher) |
Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Support re #10 MOTION to Dismiss/General Plaintiffs' Complaint filed by Fiserv, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate, #2 Exhibit(s) Merchant Application and Agreement, #3 Exhibit(s) Merchant Services Program Terms and Conditions, #4 Exhibit(s) Confirmation Page)(Knapp, Christopher) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss/General Plaintiffs' Complaint filed by Fiserv, Inc.. (Knapp, Christopher) |
Filing 9 (Text-Only) ORDER granting #7 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint. Fiserv, Inc. answer due 6/23/2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 6/10/2021. (KAT) |
Filing 8 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #7 Stipulation. (Knapp, Christopher) |
Filing 7 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint by Fiserv, Inc.. Jointly Signed by Retire Young, Inc. and Kevin Young. (Knapp, Christopher) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher J Knapp on behalf of Fiserv, Inc.. (Knapp, Christopher) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Retire Young, Inc.. Fiserv, Inc. served on 5/19/2021, answer due 6/9/2021. (Herman, Katherine) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Fiserv, Inc. (lmb) |
Filing 3 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Nancy E. Brasel per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. Please use case number 21-cv-1224 (NEB/KMM). (lmb) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET re #1 Complaint, filed by Fiserv, Inc. filed by Retire Young, Inc., Kevin Young. (Moss, Carol) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Fiserv, Inc. (filing fee $402, receipt number AMNDC-8753235) filed by Retire Young, Inc., Kevin Young. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - CardConnect Ltr to Retire Young, Inc., #2 Exhibit B - Security Rules Ch 11) (Moss, Carol) Modified text on 5/17/2021 (lmb). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.