Erwin v. Ans et al
| Kenneth David Erwin |
| Charles Ans and Montserrat Gomez Maqueo Zaldivar |
| 0:2021cv01591 |
| July 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Patrick J Schiltz |
| Elizabeth Cowan Wright |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 REPORT ON FILING OF COPYRIGHT ACTION (The Clerk's Office will mail a copy of the AO 121 and the Complaint to the U.S Copyright Office.) cc: Copyright Office. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(MTP) Document QC'd on 7/27/2021 (KDS). |
| Filing 3 LETTER from the Clerk's Office to Erwin enclosing AO 121 Form. (Attachments: #1 AO 121 Form)(NAH) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Charles Ans, Montserrat Gomez Maqueo Zaldivar. cc: Erwin w/ Info Sheet (NAH) Modified text on 7/9/2021 (NAH). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Charles Ans, Montserrat Gomez Maqueo Zaldivar (filing fee $402, receipt number 3-16257) filed by Kenneth David Erwin. Filer requests summons issued. Case assigned to Judge Patrick J. Schiltz per 3rd/4th Copyright & Trademark list, referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1, #2 Attachment 2, #3 Attachment 3, #4 Attachment 4, #5 Attachment 5, #6 Civil Cover Sheet) cc: Copyright Office. (NAH) Document QC'd on 7/16/2021 (KDS). Modified text on 7/26/2021 (MTP). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
