Becker v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston et al
Plaintiff: Rachael Becker
Defendant: Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston and Peabody Investments Corp.
Case Number: 0:2021cv01666
Filed: July 20, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: David T Schultz
Referring Judge: Eric C Tostrud
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 9/14/2021. (TJB)
September 10, 2021 Filing 9 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint, filed by Peabody Investments Corp..(Kettelkamp, Brent)
September 10, 2021 Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint, filed by Peabody Investments Corp.. (Kettelkamp, Brent)
September 10, 2021 Filing 7 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary reported for Defendant Peabody Investments Corp.. (Kettelkamp, Brent)
September 10, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Brent D Kettelkamp on behalf of Peabody Investments Corp.. (Kettelkamp, Brent)
September 3, 2021 Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Rachael Becker. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston waiver sent on 7/20/2021, answer due 9/20/2021. (Lemon, Nicole)
September 3, 2021 Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Rachael Becker. Peabody Investments Corp. waiver sent on 7/20/2021, answer due 9/20/2021. (Lemon, Nicole)
July 20, 2021 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston, Peabody Investments Corp. (MTP)
July 20, 2021 Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud per Civil (3rd/4th Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 21-cv-01666 ECT/DTS. (MTP)
July 20, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-8893778) filed by Rachael Becker. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Lemon, Nicole)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Becker v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rachael Becker
Represented By: Nicole Amber Lemon
Represented By: Zachary Schmoll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Peabody Investments Corp.
Represented By: Brent D Kettelkamp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?