Graham v. U.S. Marshal
| William Charles Graham |
| U.S. Marshal |
| 0:2021cv01716 |
| July 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| John F Docherty |
| Paul A Magnuson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 JUDGMENT (Attachments: #1 Civil Notice - appeal, #2 Appeal Packet)(CLK) |
Filing 12
ORDER DISMISSING CASE: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Signed by The Hon. Paul A. Magnuson on 8/18/2021.(LLM)
|
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re Summons by William Charles Graham (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(MTP) Document QCd on 9/23/2021 (MMG). |
| Filing 10 LETTER from the Clerk's Office to William Graham returning summons. cc: Graham. (kt) |
| Filing 9 AMENDED BOND by William Charles Graham (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Envelope)(MTP) Document QC'd on 8/24/2021 (MTP). |
| Filing 8 LETTER from Clerk's Office to William Charles Graham. (Attachments: #1 AO 239 - Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs)(MTP) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED BOND by William Charles Graham (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Envelope)(MTP) Document QC'd on 8/31/2021 (MMG). |
| Filing 6 BOND by William Charles Graham (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Certificate of Service, #3 Envelope)(MTP) Qc'd on 8/17/2021 (KNK). |
|
Filing 5
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty recused. NOTE: The new case number is 21-cv-1716 (PAM). Please use this case number for all subsequent pleadings. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 7/29/2021.(lmb)
|
| Filing 4 LETTER from Clerk's Office to re: Filing Fee, enclosing (AO 239) Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs cc: William Graham. (JGK) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by William Charles Graham re #2 Notice (Other), #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, (JGK) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE (Cost Bond) by William Charles Graham (JGK) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by William Charles Graham. Case assigned to Judge Paul A. Magnuson per 3rd/4th Prisoner list, referred to Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1, #2 Exhibit(s) 2, #3 Exhibit(s) 3, #4 Exhibit(s) 4, #5 Exhibit(s) 5, #6 Exhibit(s) 6, #7 Exhibit(s) 7, #8 Exhibit(s) 8, #9 Exhibit(s) 9, #10 Exhibit(s) 10, #11 Envelope) (JGK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Graham v. U.S. Marshal | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: William Charles Graham | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: U.S. Marshal | |
| Represented By: | Ana H Voss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
