Cabuchola v. Experian Information Services LLC
| Sean Cabuchola |
| Trans Union, LLC and Experian Information Services LLC |
| 0:2021cv01838 |
| August 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| David T Schultz |
| Eric C Tostrud |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
TEXT-ONLY ORDER Cancelling Deadline & Hearing. The pretrial conference before Mag. Judge Schultz on 10/19/21 is CANCELLED. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 10/8/2021. (TJB)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Settlement with Experian by Sean Cabuchola (Koe, Joseph) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance of Joseph Koe on behalf of Sean Cabuchola, filed by David J S Madgett. (Madgett, David) Modified text on 9/9/2021 (lmb). |
|
Filing 10
ORDER/NOTICE FOR PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Parties are directed to Meet and Confer by 10/12/2021. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/12/2021. Pretrial Conference set for 10/19/2021 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 9E (MPLS) before Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 8/24/2021. (TJB) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/25/2021: #1 Consent Form) (TJB).
|
| Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Experian Information Services LLC. filed by Sean Cabuchola. No summons requested. (Madgett, David) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Experian Information Services LLC. (Lacy, Samuel) |
| Filing 7 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary reported for Defendant Experian Information Services LLC. (Lacy, Samuel) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Sean Cabuchola (Madgett, David) |
| Filing 5 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary reported for Defendant Trans Union, LLC. (Fisher, Bradley) |
| Filing 4 DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR - MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Taylor A. Decker. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-8959892 filed by Trans Union, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Fisher, Bradley) Modified text on 8/24/2021 (NAH). |
| Filing 3 (Text-Only): Notice re: Non-Admitted AttorneyWe have received documents listing Joseph Koe as counsel of record. If he or she wishes to be listed as an attorney of record in this case, he or she must be admitted to the bar of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (a), (b) and (c) or temporarily admitted pro hac vice in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (d) or (e).For more admissions information and forms, please see the Attorney Forms Section of the courts website at #www.mnd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms#. (MMP) cc: Joseph Koe. Modified text on 8/13/2021 (MMP). |
| Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud per 3rd 4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 21-cv-1838 (ECT/DTS). (MMP) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hennepin County (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-8950238) filed by Trans Union, LLC. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A - Summons, #2 Exhibit(s) B - Complaint, #3 Exhibit(s) C - Notice of Filling Notice of Removal in State, #4 Exhibit(s) D - Consent to Removal, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Certificate of Service) (Fisher, Bradley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
