Wells v. Torax Medical, Inc. et al
| Lewis Wells |
| Torax Medical, Inc. and Ethicon, Inc. |
| 0:2021cv01922 |
| August 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| David S Doty |
| Elizabeth Cowan Wright |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT OF RELATED CASES. Case reassigned to Judge David S. Doty and Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright for all further proceedings. Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright, Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson no longer assigned to case. NOTE: the new case number is 21-cv-1922 DSD/ECW. Please use this case number for all subsequent pleadings. Signed by Judge David S. Doty and Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright on 9/30/2021 and Judge Eric C. Tostrud on 10/1/2021.(CLK)
|
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lewis Wells. Torax Medical, Inc. served on 9/2/2021, answer due 9/23/2021. (Jones, Andrew) |
| Filing 10 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary reported for Defendants Ethicon, Inc., Torax Medical, Inc.. (Morgenroth, Brandie) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Ethicon, Inc., Torax Medical, Inc.. (Morgenroth, Brandie) |
| Filing 8 (Text-Only) NOTICE - Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright's Practice Pointers are available on the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota's #website. All parties are expected to be familiar with and adhere to these Practice Pointers, including Judge Wright's deviations from the Local Rules with respect to motion scheduling and briefing deadlines. (RJE) |
|
Filing 7
TEXT ONLY ENTRY: ORDER granting #5 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Michael Sawicki for Lewis Wells; granting #6 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Andrew Jones for Lewis Wells. Approved by Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson on 8/31/2021. (NAH)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Andrew Jones. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-8983453 filed by Lewis Wells. (Raso, Ashleigh) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Michael Sawicki. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-8983447 filed by Lewis Wells. (Raso, Ashleigh) |
| Filing 4 (Text-Only): Notice re: Non-Admitted AttorneyWe have received documents listing Andrew A. Jones, Michael G. Sawicki as counsel of record. If he or she wishes to be listed as an attorney of record in this case, he or she must be admitted to the bar of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (a), (b) and (c) or temporarily admitted pro hac vice in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (d) or (e).For more admissions information and forms, please see the Attorney Forms Section of the courts website at #www.mnd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms#. (KDS) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Ethicon, Inc., Torax Medical, Inc. (KDS) |
| Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright per 3rd/4th Civil Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. Please use case number 21-cv-1922 WMW/BRT. (KDS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ethicon, Inc., Torax Medical, Inc. (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-8978587) filed by Lewis Wells. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Raso, Ashleigh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
