Devisme v. Center City Housing et al
Andrew Devisme |
Center City Housing, Human Develepment Center and St Louis Co Sixth District Courts |
0:2021cv01935 |
August 27, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Leo I Brisbois |
Michael J Davis |
Civil Rights: Accommodations |
42 U.S.C. ยง 3601 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 JUDGMENT (Attachments: #1 Civil Notice - appeal)(MMG) |
Filing 4 ORDER denying #2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff Andrew Devisme's Complaint #1 is DISMISSED without prejudice. 2. Devisme's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs #2 is DENIED as moot. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 10/14/2021. (GRR) |
Filing 3 NOTICE (Waiver of Service) by Andrew Devisme (JGK) Document QC'd by JME on 9/7/2021 (JME). |
Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Andrew Devisme. (JGK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Center City Housing, Human Develepment Center, St Louis Co Sixth District Courts filed by Andrew Devisme. No summons requested. Case assigned to Judge Michael J. Davis per 5th Civil Rights - Housing Accommodations/ADA Other list, referred to Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. (JGK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.