Muehlbauer v. CenterPoint Energy Resources Corporation
| Joseph Muehlbauer |
| CenterPoint Energy Resources Corporation doing business as CenterPoint Energy Minnesota Gas doing business as CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco |
| 0:2021cv01950 |
| August 31, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Tony N Leung |
| John R Tunheim |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. Filed by CenterPoint Energy Resources Corporation. Jointly Signed by Joseph Muehlbauer.(Lipschultz, Noah) |
Filing 6
NOTICE OF AND ORDER FOR PRETRIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Pretrial Conference set for 11/1/2021 at 10:00 AM, by Telephone Conference, before Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 9/7/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (HAM)
|
|
Filing 5
DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR PER TNL CHAMBERS - WILL REFILE - NOTICE OF AND ORDER FOR PRETRIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Pretrial Conference set for 11/1/2021 at 10:00 AM, by Telephone Conference, before Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 9/7/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (HAM) Modified text on 9/8/2021 (MMP).
|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint filed by CenterPoint Energy Resources Corporation. (Lipschultz, Noah) |
| Filing 3 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge John R. Tunheim per Civil (3rd, 4th - Civil Rights) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. Please use case number 21-cv-1950 (JRT/TNL). (MKB) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary reported for Defendant CenterPoint Energy Resources Corporation d/b/a CenterPoint Energy Minnesota Gas, formerly d/b/a CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Lipschultz, Noah) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hennepin (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-8988381) filed by CenterPoint Energy Resources Corporation d/b/a CenterPoint Energy Minnesota Gas, formerly d/b/a CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Certificate of Service) (Lipschultz, Noah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Muehlbauer v. CenterPoint Energy Resources Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Joseph Muehlbauer | |
| Represented By: | Bryce M Miller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CenterPoint Energy Resources Corporation doing business as CenterPoint Energy Minnesota Gas doing business as CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco | |
| Represented By: | Minhquang Trang |
| Represented By: | Noah G Lipschultz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
