Stahls' Inc. v. RhinoTech Inc. et al
| Stahls' Inc. a Michigan corporation doing business as GroupeSTAHL |
| RhinoTech Inc. and RhinoTech Supplies Inc. |
| 0:2021cv02007 |
| September 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Nancy E Brasel |
| David T Schultz |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Stahls' Inc. (Scobie, Rachel) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON FILING OF PATENT/TRADEMARK ACTION (AO 120)(USPTO noticed with filing). (Scobie, Rachel) |
| Filing 3 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Nancy E. Brasel per Civil (3rd, 4th - Patent) list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 21-cv-2007 NEB/DTS. (CLK) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Plaintiff Stahls' Inc. d/b/a GroupeSTAHL. (Scobie, Rachel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against RhinoTech Inc., RhinoTech Supplies Inc. (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9012538) filed by Stahls' Inc. d/b/a GroupeSTAHL. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Exhibit(s) C, #4 Exhibit(s) D, #5 Exhibit(s) E, #6 Exhibit(s) F, #7 Civil Cover Sheet) (Scobie, Rachel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
