Elwood v. BELFOR USA Group, Inc.
Plaintiff: Clifford W Elwood and Clifford W. Elwood
Defendant: Belfor USA Group, Inc and BELFOR USA Group, Inc. doing business as BELFOR Property Restoration
Case Number: 0:2021cv02045
Filed: September 15, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: Patrick J Schiltz
Referring Judge: David T Schultz
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER/NOTICE FOR PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Parties are directed to Meet and Confer by 12/7/2021. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 12/7/2021. Pretrial Conference set for 12/14/2021 at 11:30 AM in Video Conference (no courtroom) before Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 10/26/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)Notice to Public: Please visit our website at #https://www.mnd.uscourts.gov/court-schedules for audio connection information for this hearing. Note that hearings might not appear on the court schedule or courthouse kiosk until one week before the hearing date. (TJB)
October 6, 2021 Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss/General filed by BELFOR USA Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Notice)(White, Christine)
September 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER on #9 Stipulation. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 9/28/2021. (TJB)
September 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: ORDER granting #6 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Emily Olivier Kesler for Belfor USA Group, Inc Belfor Property Restoration. Approved by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 9/28/2021. (NAH)
September 27, 2021 Filing 9 STIPULATION Regarding Proper Defendant by Belfor USA Group, Inc Belfor Property Restoration. Jointly Signed by Clifford Elwood. (Mah, Scott)
September 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER on #5 Stipulation. Answer due 10/6/21. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 9/23/2021. (TJB)
September 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: ORDER granting #4 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Christine Marie White for Belfor USA Group, Inc Belfor Property Restoration. Approved by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 9/22/2021. (JGK)
September 22, 2021 Filing 6 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Emily Olivier Kesler. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number BMNDC-9036712 filed by Belfor USA Group, Inc Belfor Property Restoration. (Magarian, Edward)
September 21, 2021 Filing 5 STIPULATION to Extend Time for Defendant to File a Responsive Pleading to the Complaint by Belfor USA Group, Inc Belfor Property Restoration. Jointly Signed by Clifford W. Elwood. (Mah, Scott)
September 16, 2021 Filing 4 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Christine M. White. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-9025064 filed by Belfor USA Group, Inc. (Magarian, Edward)
September 16, 2021 Filing 3 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Patrick J. Schiltz per 3rd/4th Civil Rights list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 21-cv-2045 PJS/DTS. (kt)
September 16, 2021 Filing 2 (Text-Only): Notice re: Non-Admitted AttorneyWe have received documents listing Christine Marie White as counsel of record. If he or she wishes to be listed as an attorney of record in this case, he or she must be admitted to the bar of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (a), (b) and (c) or temporarily admitted pro hac vice in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (d) or (e).For more admissions information and forms, please see the Attorney Forms Section of the courts website at #www.mnd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms#. (kt) Modified text on 9/22/2021 (lmb).
September 15, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from MN State Court (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9023180) filed by Belfor USA Group, Inc. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1, #2 Exhibit(s) 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Mah, Scott)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Elwood v. BELFOR USA Group, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Clifford W Elwood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Clifford W. Elwood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Belfor USA Group, Inc
Represented By: Scott Mah
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BELFOR USA Group, Inc. doing business as BELFOR Property Restoration
Represented By: Christine Marie White
Represented By: Edward B Magarian
Represented By: Emily Olivier Kesler
Represented By: Scott Mah
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?