Adams v. 3M Company et al
| Richard Adams |
| 3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC |
| 0:2021cv02067 |
| September 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Katherine M Menendez |
| John R Tunheim |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
LETTER TO DISTRICT JUDGE by 3M Company, Aearo Technologies LLC advising Defendants no longer opposing remand. (Hulse, Benjamin)
|
|
Filing 5
Defendants 3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC's ANSWER to Complaint filed by 3M Company, Aearo Technologies LLC. (Hulse, Benjamin)
|
|
Filing 4
(Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Chief Judge John R. Tunheim per MDL list, referred to Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. Please use case number 21-cv-2067 JRT/KMM. (CLK)
|
|
Filing 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by 3M Company re #2 Rule 7.1 - Disclosure Statement, #1 Notice of Removal, (Hulse, Benjamin)
|
|
Filing 2
RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Defendant 3M Company. (Hulse, Benjamin)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9030433) filed by 3M Company. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint, #2 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Hulse, Benjamin)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
