Huntington National Bank v. Campisi Environmental Associates, Inc. et al
| Huntington National Bank |
| Campisi Environmental Associates, Inc. doing business as Corporate Environmental Advisors and Joseph S. Campisi |
| 0:2021cv02089 |
| September 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| David T Schultz |
| Eric C Tostrud |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Huntington National Bank. Joseph S. Campisi served on 9/22/2021, answer due 10/13/2021. (Moak, Daniel) |
| Filing 4 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary reported for Plaintiff Huntington National Bank. (Moak, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Joseph S. Campisi, Campisi Environmental Associates, Inc.. (MMG) |
| Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 21-cv-2089 ECT/DTS. (MMG) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Joseph S. Campisi, Campisi Environmental Associates, Inc. (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9036553) filed by Huntington National Bank. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A-H, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Moak, Daniel) Modified text on 9/22/2021 (MMG). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
