Sticha v. Brandl/Anderson Homes, Inc.
| Curt Sticha |
| Brandl/Anderson Homes, Inc. |
| 0:2021cv02111 |
| September 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| David S Doty |
| Becky R Thorson |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Defendant Brandl/Anderson Homes, Inc.. (Bachman, Lisa)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER/NOTICE: ORDER FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. Confidential Letter to Court due by 3/18/2022. Parties are directed to Meet and Confer by 3/14/2022. Settlement Conference set for 3/22/2022 at 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. Signed by Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson on 10/25/2021.(MSK)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER/NOTICE: PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER. Amended Pleadings due by 5/2/2022. Fact Discovery due by 6/15/2022. Joinder of Parties due by 5/2/2022. Motions (non-disp) due 6/22/2022. Motions (disp) due by 8/22/2022. Ready for trial due by 12/22/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson on 10/25/2021.(MSK)
|
|
Filing 6
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson: Initial Pretrial Conference held on 10/21/2021. (MSK)
|
|
Filing 5
REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. Filed by Brandl/Anderson Homes, Inc.. Jointly Signed by Curt Sticha.(Bachman, Lisa)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER/NOTICE: Pretrial Conference set for 10/21/2021 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. Signed by Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson on 10/6/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(MSK)
|
|
Filing 3
(Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge David S. Doty per 3rd 4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. Please use case number 21-cv-2111 (DSD/BRT). (MMP)
|
|
Filing 2
ANSWER to Complaint filed by Brandl/Anderson Homes, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service) (Bachman, Lisa)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from First Judicial District, Dakota County, case number Not yet Assigned (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9043064) filed by Brandl/Anderson Homes, Inc.. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A - Summons & Complaint, #2 Exhibit(s) B - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bachman, Lisa)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sticha v. Brandl/Anderson Homes, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Curt Sticha | |
| Represented By: | Eric D Satre |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Brandl/Anderson Homes, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Lisa Lamm Bachman |
| Represented By: | Tessa A. Mansfield |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
