Kremer & Davis, Inc. v. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Company
| Kremer & Davis, Inc. |
| Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Company |
| 0:2021cv02180 |
| October 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| David T Schultz |
| John R Tunheim |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 EXHIBIT A-Summons and Complaint re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Company. (Wood, Brian) |
| Filing 4 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Chief Judge John R. Tunheim per 3rd 4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 21-cv-2180 (JRT/DTS). (MMP) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Company. (Wood, Brian) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against Kremer & Davis, Inc.. filed by Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service) (Wood, Brian) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9062492) filed by Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Company. No summons requested. (Attachments: ATTACHMENT FILED IN ERROR - WILL REFILE - #1 Exhibit(s) Summons and Complaint, #2 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Wood, Brian) Modified text on 10/5/2021 (MMP). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
