BTL Industries, Inc. v. Joules Medspa and Laser Center L.L.C.
| BTL Industries, Inc. |
| Joules Medspa and Laser Center L.L.C. |
| 0:2021cv02214 |
| October 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| John F Docherty |
| Donovan W Frank |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 44 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER/NOTICE OF PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Rule 26 Meeting Report and confidential letters due by 12/13/2021. Pretrial Conference set for 12/20/2021 at 01:00 PM via Telephone Conference (no courtroom) before Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 11/18/2021. (Attachments: #1 26(f) Template, #2 Consent Form)(TJS)
|
| Filing 15 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Defendant Joules Medspa and Laser Center L.L.C.. (Schaap, Matthew) |
| Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Joules Medspa and Laser Center L.L.C.. (Schaap, Matthew) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER on #11 Stipulation. Joules Medspa and Laser Center L.L.C. answer due 11/16/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 11/3/2021.(TJS)
|
| Filing 12 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #11 Stipulation. (Schaap, Matthew) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT by Joules Medspa and Laser Center L.L.C.. Jointly Signed by BTL Industries, Inc.. (Schaap, Matthew) |
| Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT of Service by BTL Industries, Inc. re #2 Rule 7.1 - Disclosure Statement, #1 Complaint, (Alton, Larina) |
|
Filing 9
TEXT ONLY ENTRY: ORDER granting #4 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Chandrika Vira for BTL Industries, Inc.; granting #5 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Monica Riva Talley for BTL Industries, Inc.; granting #3 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney John Christopher Rozendaal for BTL Industries, Inc. Approved by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 10/18/2021. (NAH)
|
| Filing 8 REPORT ON FILING OF PATENT/TRADEMARK ACTION (AO 120)(USPTO noticed with filing). (Alton, Larina) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Joules Medspa and Laser Center L.L.C.. (MMG) |
| Filing 6 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Donovan W. Frank per 3rd/4th Copyright, Trademark list, referred to Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. Please use case number 21-cv-2214 DWF/JFD. (MMG) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Monica Riva Talley. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-9069952 filed by BTL Industries, Inc.. (Alton, Larina) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Chandrika Vira. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-9069940 filed by BTL Industries, Inc.. (Alton, Larina) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney J.C. Rozendaal. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-9069901 filed by BTL Industries, Inc.. (Alton, Larina) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT that Plaintiff BTL Industries, Inc.'s corporate parent is BTL Holdings Limited. (Alton, Larina) Modified text on 10/7/2021 (kt). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Joules Medspa and Laser Center L.L.C. (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9069627) filed by BTL Industries, Inc.. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Exhibits 1-17, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Alton, Larina) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
