Larsen v. Menard, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Roberta Larsen
Defendant: Menard, Inc. and ARAMARK Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC
Case Number: 0:2021cv02324
Filed: October 19, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: David T Schultz
Referring Judge: Eric C Tostrud
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER/NOTICE FOR PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Parties are directed to Meet and Confer by 1/4/2022. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 1/4/2022. Pretrial Conference set for 1/11/2022 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 9E (MPLS) before Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 12/13/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (TJB)
November 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Defendant Menard, Inc.. (Rajkowski, Paul)
November 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT in Support re #1 Notice of Removal, . (Krueger, Allison)
November 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Paul A Rajkowski on behalf of Menard, Inc.. (Rajkowski, Paul)
November 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER FOR PARTY TO FILE DOCUMENT/RESPOND TO COURT. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 11/2/2021. (TJB)
October 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud per 3rd 4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 21-cv-2324 (ECT/DTS). (MMP)
October 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary reported for Defendant ARAMARK Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC. (Krueger, Allison) Modified text on 10/19/2021 (MMP).
October 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Sherburne County District Court, case number 71-CV-21-1136 (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9092008) filed by ARAMARK Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Exhibit(s) C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Krueger, Allison) Modified text on 10/19/2021 (MMP).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Larsen v. Menard, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roberta Larsen
Represented By: James P Carey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Menard, Inc.
Represented By: Paul A Rajkowski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ARAMARK Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC
Represented By: Eugene C Shermoen, Jr
Represented By: Allison N. Krueger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?