Ng v. Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota et al
Evan Ng |
Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota, Mark Coyle and Joan T.A. Gable |
0:2021cv02404 |
October 29, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Nancy E Brasel |
Susan Richard Nelson |
Becky R Thorson |
Civil Rights: Other |
20 U.S.C. § 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 Reply to Response to Motion re #7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Evan Ng.(Trotter, Caleb) |
Filing 30 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota, Mark Coyle, Joan T.A. Gable.(Benrud, Brent) |
Filing 29 DECLARATION of Mark Coyle in Opposition to #7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota, Mark Coyle, Joan T.A. Gable. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s))(Benrud, Brent) |
Filing 28 DECLARATION of Marc Ryan in Opposition to #7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota, Mark Coyle, Joan T.A. Gable.(Benrud, Brent) |
Filing 27 DECLARATION of Julie Manning in Opposition to #7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota, Mark Coyle, Joan T.A. Gable. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s))(Benrud, Brent) |
Filing 26 Reply to Response to Motion re #7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota, Mark Coyle, Joan T.A. Gable. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Benrud, Brent) |
Filing 25 ORDER on #23 Stipulation. Defendants' response to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction is now due: 12/3/2021. Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 11/15/2021. (SMD) |
Filing 24 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #23 Stipulation. (Pramas, Timothy) |
Filing 23 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION by Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota, Mark Coyle, Joan T.A. Gable. (Pramas, Timothy) |
Filing 22 ORDER on #19 Stipulation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson on 11/10/2021.(MSK) |
Filing 21 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #19 Stipulation. (Pramas, Timothy) |
Filing 20 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #19 Stipulation. (Pramas, Timothy) |
Filing 19 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint by Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota, Mark Coyle, Joan T.A. Gable. (Pramas, Timothy) |
Filing 18 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION #7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction : Motion Hearing set for 1/10/2022 at 01:00 PM in Video Conference (no courtroom) before Judge Susan Richard Nelson. (Trotter, Caleb) |
Filing 17 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Nancy E. Brasel recused. Case reassigned to Judge Susan Richard Nelson for all further proceedings. NOTE: the new case number is 21-cv-2404 (SRN/BRT). Please use this case number for all subsequent pleadings Signed by Judge Nancy E. Brasel on 11/9/2021.(MMP) |
Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy Joseph Pramas on behalf of Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota, Mark Coyle, Joan T.A. Gable. (Pramas, Timothy) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Carrie Ryan Gallia on behalf of Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota, Mark Coyle, Joan T.A. Gable. (Ryan Gallia, Carrie) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Brent P Benrud on behalf of Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota, Mark Coyle, Joan T.A. Gable. (Benrud, Brent) |
Filing 13 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Evan Ng.(Trotter, Caleb) |
Filing 12 Declaration of Brian Meeker in Support of #7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Evan Ng. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Exhibit(s) C, #4 Exhibit(s) D, #5 Exhibit(s) E)(Trotter, Caleb) |
Filing 11 Declaration of Mike Burns in Support of #7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Evan Ng.(Trotter, Caleb) |
Filing 10 Declaration of Evan Ng in Support of #7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Evan Ng.(Trotter, Caleb) |
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM in Support re #7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Evan Ng.(Trotter, Caleb) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION #7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction : Motion Hearing set for 1/12/2022 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 13W (MPLS) before Judge Nancy E. Brasel. (Trotter, Caleb) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Evan Ng. (Trotter, Caleb) |
Filing 6 (Text-Only) ORDER granting #3 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Caleb Randall Trotter for Evan Ng; granting #2 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Erin Elizabeth Wilcox for Evan Ng. Approved by Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson on 11/2/2021. (NAH) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota, Mark Coyle, Joan T.A. Gable. (KNK) |
Filing 4 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Nancy E. Brasel per 3rd, 4th - Civil Rights list, referred to Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. Please use case number 21-cv-2404 (NEB/BRT). (KNK) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Caleb R. Trotter. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-9112985 filed by Evan Ng. (Diehl, Samuel) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Erin E. Wilcox. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-9112961 filed by Evan Ng. (Diehl, Samuel) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9112940) filed by Evan Ng. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Diehl, Samuel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.