Mohamed et al v. Tritten et al
| Abdiaziz Ali Mohamed and Sada Mohamed Barkatla |
| Leslie Tritten, Ur Jaddou and Alejandro Mayorkas |
| 0:2021cv02519 |
| November 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| David T Schultz |
| John R Tunheim |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Sada Mohamed Barkatla, Abdiaziz Ali Mohamed (Prokosch, Marc) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by David W Fuller on behalf of Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Leslie Tritten. (Fuller, David) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Kelsey Hines on behalf of Sada Mohamed Barkatla, Abdiaziz Ali Mohamed. (Hines, Kelsey) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Leslie Tritten. (MMG) |
| Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge John R. Tunheim per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 21-cv-2519 JRT/DTS. (MMG) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9152023) filed by Abdiaziz Ali Mohamed, Sada Mohamed Barkatla. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Prokosch, Marc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
