Vargas v. Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston
Nancy Hoyos |
Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston and Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston, a foreign corporation |
0:2021cv02524 |
November 18, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
John F Docherty |
Wilhelmina M Wright |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 6/13/2022. Motions for Discovery due by 5/13/2022. Joinder of Parties due by 6/13/2022. Motions (non-disp) due 7/15/2022. Motions (disp) due by 11/30/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 1/14/2022.(MME) |
Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Motion for Permission for Non-Resident Attorney to Serve as Local Counsel and Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright on 1/14/2022. (ABR) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Cristin Mack. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-9253337 filed by Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston. (Attachments: #1 Motion for Non-Resident to Serve as Local Counsel)(Decker, Byrne) |
Filing 10 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. Filed by Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston. Jointly Signed by Plaintiff Nancy Hoyos n/k/a Nancy Vargas.(Decker, Byrne) |
Filing 9 ORDER FOR SCHEDULING RECOMMENDATIONS: Rule 26 Meeting Report and confidential letters due on or before 1/12/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 12/29/2021. (Attachments: #1 26(f) Template, #2 Consent Form)(TJS) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston. (Decker, Byrne) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston answer due 12/27/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 11/24/2021. (TJS) |
Filing 6 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #5 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston.(Decker, Byrne) |
Filing 5 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston. ATTACHMENT FILED IN ERROR-REFILED AT #6 . (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Decker, Byrne) Modified text on 11/24/2021 (MKB). |
Filing 4 (Text-Only) NOTICE - Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright's Practice Pointers are available on the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota's #website. All parties are expected to be familiar with and adhere to these Practice Pointers, including Judge Wright's deviations from the Local Rules with respect to motion scheduling and briefing deadlines. (RJE) |
Filing 3 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright per 3rd, 4th - Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. Please use case number 21-cv-2524 (WMW/JFD). (KNK) |
Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary reported for Defendant Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston. (Decker, Byrne) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from District Court, County of Hennepin, Fourth Judicial District (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9153546) filed by Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A - Service of Process, #2 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Notice of Appearance, #5 Certificate of Service) (Decker, Byrne) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.