Lamke v. Sunbelt Rentals, Inc.
Plaintiff: Megan M. Lamke
Defendant: Sunbelt Rentals, Inc.
Case Number: 0:2021cv02646
Filed: December 9, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: Hildy Bowbeer
Referring Judge: John R Tunheim
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 19, 2022 Filing 8 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. Filed by Sunbelt Rentals, Inc.. Jointly Signed by Megan M. Lamke.(Radmer, John)
December 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 TEXT ONLY ORDER - DATE & TIME CHANGE: Due to a change in the Court's calendar, the starting time of the Pretrial Scheduling Conference, currently set for 1/21/2022 at 11:00 AM, is being changed. The Pretrial Scheduling Conference will now be conducted by the undersigned on 2/8/2022 at 9:15 AM by Conference Bridge. Rule 26 Meeting Report and Confidential Settlement Letters due 2/1/2022. Call-in instructions will be provided a few days prior to the conference. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer on 12/30/2021.(LNP)
December 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER SETTING PRETRIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 1/14/2022. Confidential settlement letter due by 1/14/2022. Pretrial Conference set for 1/21/2022 at 11:00 AM by Telephone Conference (no courtroom) before Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer on 12/10/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(LNP).
December 10, 2021 Filing 5 (Text-Only) NOTICE - Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer's Practice Pointers are available on the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota's #website. All parties are expected to be familiar with and adhere to these Practice Pointers, including any variances from Local Rules. (LNP)
December 10, 2021 Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) filed by Sunbelt Rentals, Inc.. (Radmer, John)
December 9, 2021 Filing 3 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge John R. Tunheim per Civil (3rd/4th Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer. Please use case number 21-cv-02646 JRT/HB. (MTP)
December 9, 2021 Filing 2 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Sunbelt Rentals, Inc.. (Radmer, John)
December 9, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hennepin County District Court (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9199035) filed by Sunbelt Rentals, Inc.. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A Summons & Complaint, #2 FILED IN ERROR: Exhibit(s) B Answer, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Affidavit of Service) (Radmer, John) Modified text on 12/9/2021 (MTP).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lamke v. Sunbelt Rentals, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Megan M. Lamke
Represented By: James P Carey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sunbelt Rentals, Inc.
Represented By: Alejandra Martinez
Represented By: John E Radmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?