Widner v. East Viking Commons LLP
| Travis Widner |
| East Viking Commons LLP |
| 0:2021cv02715 |
| December 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| John F Docherty |
| Patrick J Schiltz |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER: Motions to Amend Pleadings or Join Parties due by 3/15/2022. Fact Discovery due by 8/1/2022. Expert Discovery due by 10/15/2022. Motions (non-disp) which relate to expert discovery due 10/15/2022. Motions (disp) due by 12/15/2022. Ready for trial by 4/17/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 2/7/2022.(TJS)
|
| Filing 7 (Text-Only) Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty: Pretrial Conference held on 2/7/2022. Appearances: Patrick Michenfelder for Plaintiff, Steven Erffmeyer for Defendant. Pretrial Scheduling Order will issue. (TJS) |
| Filing 6 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. Filed by East Viking Commons LLP. Jointly Signed by Travis Widner.(Erffmeyer, Steven) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER/NOTICE OF PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Rule 26 Meeting Report and confidential letters due by 1/31/2022. Pretrial Conference set for 2/7/2022 at 11:30 AM via Telephone Conference (no courtroom) before Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 1/13/2022. (Attachments: #1 26(f) Template, #2 Consent Form)(TJS)
|
| Filing 4 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Patrick J. Schiltz per 3rd/4th - Civil Rights: Housing/Accommodations, ADA Other list, referred to Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. Please use case number 21-cv-2715 PJS/JFD. (kt) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint filed by East Viking Commons LLP. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service Affidavit of Service) (Erffmeyer, Steven) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Travis Widner filed by East Vikings Commons, LLP. (Erffmeyer, Steven) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Chisago County (filing fee $402, receipt number AMNDC-9221799) filed by East Viking Commons LLP. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Exh A - Summons, #2 Exh B - Complaint, #3 Exh C - Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal) (Erffmeyer, Steven) Modified text on 12/21/2021 (lmb). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Widner v. East Viking Commons LLP | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Travis Widner | |
| Represented By: | Chad Throndset |
| Represented By: | Patrick W Michenfelder |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: East Viking Commons LLP | |
| Represented By: | Colby B Lund |
| Represented By: | Steven J Erffmeyer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
