Heim Milling Co., Inc. v. Trouw Nutrition USA, LLC
| Heim Milling Co., Inc. |
| Trouw Nutrition USA, LLC |
| 0:2021cv02775 |
| December 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Leo I Brisbois |
| Eric C Tostrud |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 STATEMENT OF CASE as to Trouw Nutrition USA, LLC. (Ponessa, Russell) |
| Filing 9 STATEMENT OF CASE as to Heim Milling Co., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A)(Dahlmeier, David) |
| Filing 8 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. Filed by Heim Milling Co., Inc.. Jointly Signed by Trouw Nutrition USA, LLC.(Dahlmeier, David) |
| Filing 7 REPLY to Counterclaim filed by Heim Milling Co., Inc.. (Dahlmeier, David) |
Filing 6
PRETRIAL SCHEDULING NOTICE AND ORDER WHILE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA IS UNDER GENERAL ORDER RELATED TO COVID-19: See Notice and Order for document submission deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois on 1/14/2022. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(JLB)
|
| Filing 5 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Plaintiff Heim Milling Co., Inc.. (Dahlmeier, David) |
| Filing 4 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Defendant Trouw Nutrition USA, LLC. (Ponessa, Russell) |
| Filing 3 Answer to #1 Complaint, COUNTERCLAIM against Heim Milling Co., Inc., filed by Trouw Nutrition USA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1 (Redacted), #2 Exhibit(s) 2, #3 Exhibit(s) 3, #4 Exhibit(s) 4) (Ponessa, Russell) Modified text/link on 1/7/2022 (lmb). |
| Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud per 6th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. Please use case number 21-cv-2775 (ECT/LIB). (KNK) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Stearns County District Court, case number 73-cv-21-8893 (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9239767) filed by Trouw Nutrition USA, LLC. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit(s) Plaintiff's Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Affidavit of Service) (Ponessa, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Heim Milling Co., Inc. v. Trouw Nutrition USA, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Heim Milling Co., Inc. | |
| Represented By: | David M Dahlmeier |
| Represented By: | Maria Brekke |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Trouw Nutrition USA, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Russell S Ponessa |
| Represented By: | Anju Suresh |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
