Thomas Bey v. Checkr Corporation
Zar EL Javon-Martise Thomas Bey |
Checkr Corporation |
0:2022cv00040 |
January 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Tony N Leung |
Katherine M Menendez |
Assault Libel & Slander |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 (Text-Only) NOTICE of Cancelation of Hearing of #4 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint : The Motion Hearing set for 4/4/2022 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8E before Judge Katherine M. Menendez is CANCELED. The Motion to Dismiss will be decided on the paper submissions and taken under advisement. (KAT) |
Filing 17 Reply to Response to Motion re #4 MOTION to Dismiss/General Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Checkr Corporation. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate, #2 Declaration of David Dormont, #3 Exhibit(s) 1, #4 Exhibit(s) 2, #5 Exhibit(s) 3, #6 Exhibit(s) 4, #7 Exhibit(s) 5, #8 Certificate of Service)(Dormont, David) |
Filing 16 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Zar EL Javon-Martise Thomas Bey re #14 Response in Opposition to Motion, #15 Memorandum (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(MKB) |
Filing 15 MEMORANDUM in Support re #14 Response in Opposition to Motion filed by Zar EL Javon-Martise Thomas Bey. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A-D)(MKB) |
Filing 14 RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION to Dismiss/General Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Zar EL Javon-Martise Thomas Bey.(MKB) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by David Dormont on behalf of Checkr Corporation. (Dormont, David) |
Filing 12 ORDER FOR PARTY TO FILE DOCUMENT/RESPOND TO COURT re #4 MOTION to Dismiss/General Plaintiff's Complaint. Within 30 days of the motion being decided, Plaintiff shall contact the chambers of Magistrate Judge Tony Leung, by letter or e-mail, for the purpose of scheduling the pretrial conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 1/24/2022. (HAM) |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Checkr Corporation re #7 Declaration in Support, #8 Meet and Confer Statement, #10 Rule 7.1 - Disclosure Statement, #4 MOTION to Dismiss/General Plaintiff's Complaint, #9 Proposed Order to Judge, #6 Memorandum in Support of Motion, #5 Notice of Hearing on Motion (Johnson, Thomas) |
Filing 10 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary reported for Defendant Checkr Corporation. (Johnson, Thomas) |
Filing 9 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #4 MOTION to Dismiss/General Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Checkr Corporation.(Johnson, Thomas) |
Filing 8 MEET and CONFER STATEMENT re #4 Motion to Dismiss/General filed by Checkr Corporation.(Johnson, Thomas) |
Filing 7 Declaration of Thomas R. Johnson in Support of #4 MOTION to Dismiss/General Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Checkr Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A)(Johnson, Thomas) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM in Support re #4 MOTION to Dismiss/General Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Checkr Corporation. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Johnson, Thomas) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION #4 MOTION to Dismiss/General Plaintiff's Complaint : Motion Hearing set for 4/4/2022 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8E before Judge Katherine M. Menendez. (Johnson, Thomas) Modified text on 1/18/2022 (MMP). |
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss/General Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Checkr Corporation. (Johnson, Thomas) |
Filing 3 (Text-Only): Notice re: Non-Admitted AttorneyWe have received documents listing David Dormont as counsel of record. If he or she wishes to be listed as an attorney of record in this case, he or she must be admitted to the bar of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (a), (b) and (c) or temporarily admitted pro hac vice in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (d) or (e).For more admissions information and forms, please see the Attorney Forms Section of the courts website at #www.mnd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms#. (MKB) |
Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Katherine M. Menendez per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. Please use case number 21-cv-40 (KMM/TNL). (MKB) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hennepin County, case number 27-cv-21-14679 (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9253387) filed by Checkr Corporation. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint, #2 Hennepin County Docket, #3 Order Denying OFP, #4 Notice of Judicial Assignment, #5 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #6 Civil Cover Sheet) (Johnson, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Thomas Bey v. Checkr Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Zar EL Javon-Martise Thomas Bey | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Checkr Corporation | |
Represented By: | Thomas R Johnson |
Represented By: | David Dormont |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.