Ingraham v. Crown College
| Stacy Ingraham |
| Crown College |
| 0:2022cv00149 |
| January 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Becky R Thorson |
| Eric C Tostrud |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
ORDER/NOTICE: ORDER FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. Confidential Letter to Court due by 6/10/2022. Parties are directed to Meet and Confer by 6/6/2022. Settlement Conference set for 6/16/2022 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 3C (STP) before Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. Signed by Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson on 3/14/2022.(MSK)
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER/NOTICE: PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER. Amended Pleadings due by 7/1/2022. Fact Discovery due by 10/3/2022. Joinder of Parties due by 7/1/2022. Motions (non-disp) due 10/14/2022. Dispositive Motions due 2/1/2023. Ready for trial due by 6/1/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson on 3/1/2022.(MSK) Modified text on 3/2/2022 (MMP).
|
| Filing 18 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson: Initial Pretrial Conference held on 3/1/2022. (MSK) |
| Filing 17 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Crown College. (Farganis, Dion) |
| Filing 16 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. Filed by Stacy Ingraham.(Puklich, Michael) |
|
Filing 15
(Text-Only) ORDER/NOTICE, TIME CHANGE ONLY. The Pretrial Conference set for 3/1/2022 will begin at 9:00 AM via Video Conference (no courtroom) before Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson on 2/16/2022.(MSK)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER on #12 Stipulation. Crown College answer due 2/25/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson on 2/15/2022.(MSK)
|
| Filing 13 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #12 Stipulation. (Nash, Kathryn) |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION (Second) for Extension of Time for Defendant to Respond to the Complaint by Crown College. Jointly Signed by Stacy Ingraham. (Nash, Kathryn) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER/NOTICE: Pretrial Conference set for 3/1/2022 at 01:30 PM in Video Conference (no courtroom) before Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. Signed by Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson on 2/1/2022. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(MSK)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER on #8 Stipulation. Crown College answer due 2/14/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson on 1/27/2022.(MSK)
|
| Filing 9 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #8 Stipulation. (Farganis, Dion) |
| Filing 8 STIPULATION for Extension of Time for Defendant to Respond to the Complaint by Crown College. Jointly Signed by Stacy Ingraham. (Farganis, Dion) |
|
Filing 7
(Text-Only) ORDER granting #3 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Bridget Romero for Crown College. Approved by Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson on 1/26/2022. (ABR)
|
| Filing 5 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Defendant Crown College. (Nash, Kathryn) |
| Filing 4 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. Please use case number 22-cv-149 ECT/BRT. (MMG) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Bridget Romero. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-9280104 filed by Crown College. (Nash, Kathryn) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from District Court County of Carver, case number 10-cv-22-49 (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9279593) filed by Crown College. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Index, #2 Exhibit(s) Summons, #3 Exhibit(s) Complaint, #4 Exhibit(s) Certificate of Representation, #5 Exhibit(s) Notice of Case Filing, #6 Civil Cover Sheet) (Nash, Kathryn) Modified text on 1/21/2022 (MKB). Modified text on 1/24/2022 (MMP). |
| Filing 1 DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR-REFILING. NOTICE OF REMOVAL from District Court County of Carver, case number 10-cv-22-49 (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9279593) filed by Crown College. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Summons, #2 Exhibit(s) Complaint, #3 Exhibit(s) Certificate of Representation and Parties, #4 Exhibit(s) Notice of Case Filing, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (Nash, Kathryn) Modified text on 1/21/2022 (MKB). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ingraham v. Crown College | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Stacy Ingraham | |
| Represented By: | Mark E Dooley |
| Represented By: | Michael L Puklich |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Crown College | |
| Represented By: | Kathryn M Nash |
| Represented By: | Alexandra Tyre Carthew |
| Represented By: | Bridget Romero |
| Represented By: | Dion Farganis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
