Coward v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, The
Carolyn Coward |
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, The |
0:2022cv00341 |
February 3, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Katherine M Menendez |
David T Schultz |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Carolyn Coward. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, The waiver sent on 2/7/2022, answer due 4/8/2022. (Warrick, Bryan) |
![]() |
Filing 4 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Bryan Warrick. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-9312982 filed by Carolyn Coward. (Schmoll, Zachary) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, The. (MMP) |
Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Katherine M. Menendez per 3rd 4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 22-cv-341 (KMM/DTS). (MMP) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9307041) filed by Carolyn Coward. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Schmoll, Zachary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.