Cortec Corporation v. Corpac GmbH & Co. KG et al
| Cortec Corporation |
| Corpac GmbH & Co. KG, Verpa Folie Weidhausen GmbH and Safe-Pack Solutions GmbH |
| 0:2022cv00476 |
| February 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Katherine M Menendez |
| Elizabeth Cowan Wright |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
NEW CASE FILING FEE PAID in the amount of $402, receipt number AMNDC-9355679. (Lafeber, Michael)
|
|
Filing 5
RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Plaintiff Cortec Corporation. (Lafeber, Michael)
|
|
Filing 4
REPORT ON FILING OF PATENT/TRADEMARK ACTION (AO 120)(USPTO noticed with filing). (Lafeber, Michael)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to Corpac GmbH & Co. KG, Safe-Pack Solutions GmbH, Verpa Folie Weidhausen GmbH. (MTB)
|
|
Filing 2
(Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Katherine M. Menendez per Civil (3rd, 4th - Patent) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. Please use case number 22-cv-00476 KMM/ECW. (MTB)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Cortec Corporation (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9344016) filed by Cortec Corporation. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Lafeber, Michael)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
