Hapka Farms, Inc. v. Deere & Co.
Plaintiff: Hapka Farms, Inc.
Defendant: Deere & Co. and Deere & Co. doing business as John Deere
Case Number: 0:2022cv00503
Filed: February 28, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: John F Docherty
Referring Judge: David S Doty
Nature of Suit: Anti-Trust
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 2 Antitrust Litigation
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 3/21/2022. (TJS)
March 16, 2022 Filing 9 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond (Unopposed) filed by Deere & Co..(Ellison, Benjamin)
March 16, 2022 Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond (Unopposed) filed by Deere & Co.. (Ellison, Benjamin)
March 16, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE by Deere & Co. Notice of Motion to Transfer Related Cases for Consolidated Pretrial Proceedings Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B)(Ellison, Benjamin)
March 16, 2022 Filing 6 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Defendant Deere & Co.. (Ellison, Benjamin)
March 2, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Hapka Farms, Inc.. Deere & Co. served on 3/2/2022, answer due 3/23/2022. (Yard, Roberta)
March 1, 2022 Filing 4 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Plaintiff Hapka Farms, Inc.. (Yard, Roberta)
March 1, 2022 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Deere & Co. (ACH)
March 1, 2022 Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge David S. Doty per Civil (3rd, 4th - Antitrust, Securities) list, referred to Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. Please use case number 22-cv-503 DSD/JFD. (ACH)
February 28, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Class Action Complaint against Hapka Farms, Inc. (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9354063) filed by Deere & Co.. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Blanchfield, Garrett)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hapka Farms, Inc. v. Deere & Co.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hapka Farms, Inc.
Represented By: Garrett D Blanchfield, Jr
Represented By: Roberta A Yard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deere & Co.
Represented By: Garrett D Blanchfield, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deere & Co. doing business as John Deere
Represented By: Benjamin L. Ellison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?