Skaro v. Kijakazi et al
| Nicole Skaro |
| Kilolo Kijakazi, Charles Kovat and Social Security Administration |
| 0:2022cv00765 |
| March 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Tony N Leung |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 LETTER REFERRING Litigant to FBA Pro Se Project from Magistrate Judge Leung. (HAM) |
Filing 4
ORDER FOR PARTY TO FILE DOCUMENT/RESPOND TO COURT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 5/9/2022. (EB)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES: Social Security Case Assignment Form Issued. Per #Local Rule 7.2, this form must be submitted to the clerk in paper on or before the answer due date. Please mail the completed form to:U.S. District Court for the District of MinnesotaClerks Office300 South Fourth Street, Suite 202Minneapolis, MN 55415 (JGK) CC: Nicole Skaro Modified text on 3/31/2022 (JGK). |
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Nicole Skaro. (JGK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi, Charles Kovat, Social Security Administration filed by Nicole Skaro. No summons requested. Case assigned to Judge Tony N. Leung per Social Security List list. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (JGK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
