Scott v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, The
| Janeane Scott |
| The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, The |
| 0:2022cv00825 |
| April 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Tony N Leung |
| Eric C Tostrud |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
(Text-Only) ORDER granting #4 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Bryan Warrick for Janeane Scott. Approved by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 4/7/2022. (JGK)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Bryan Warrick. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-9429846 filed by Janeane Scott. (Schmoll, Zachary) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company. (MTB) |
| Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud per Civil (3rd/4th Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. Please use case number 22-cv-00825 ECT/TNL. (MTB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9428421) filed by Janeane Scott. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Schmoll, Zachary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
