Calof v. Aramark Services, Inc.
Shelly Ann Calof |
Aramark, Inc. |
0:2022cv00832 |
April 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Tony N Leung |
Ann D Montgomery |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 LETTER TO DISTRICT JUDGE AND MAGISTRATE JUDGE filed by Aramark, Inc. Regarding Settlement. (Beyer, Matthew) Modified text on 5/26/2022 (MMP). |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Beyer on behalf of Aramark, Inc.. (Beyer, Matthew) |
Filing 13 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #6 MOTION for Protective Order filed by Aramark, Inc..(Syring-Petrocchi, Tina) |
Filing 12 MEMORANDUM in Support re #6 MOTION for Protective Order filed by Aramark, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1, #2 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Syring-Petrocchi, Tina) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION #6 MOTION for Protective Order : Motion Hearing set for 6/3/2022 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9W (MPLS) before Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. (Syring-Petrocchi, Tina) |
Filing 10 TEXT-ONLY NOTICE of Non-Compliance with #Local Rule 7.1 Civil Motion Practice for #6 Motion for Protective Order. No Memorandum of Law Filed. No Notice of Hearing on Motion Filed. No Word Count Compliance Certificate Filed. No Proposed Order filed in CM/ECF. Please file according to the rule and contact the appropriate chambers if further direction is needed. (KLN) |
Filing 9 ORDER FOR COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 26(f) TO FACILITATE ISSUANCE OF RULE 16 PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER. Parties are directed to Meet and Confer by 4/28/2022. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 5/12/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 4/14/2022. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (HAM) |
Filing 8 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #6 MOTION for Protective Order filed by Aramark, Inc..(Syring-Petrocchi, Tina) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Aramark, Inc.. (Syring-Petrocchi, Tina) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Protective Order filed by Aramark, Inc.. ATTACHMENT FILED IN ERROR - WILL REFILE - (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1)(Syring-Petrocchi, Tina) Modified text on 4/14/2022 (MMP). |
Filing 5 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, Defendant Aramark Services, Inc. (incorrectly named in the Complaint as Aramark, Inc.), by and through its attorneys, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, hereby submits the following Corporate Disclosure Statement: Aramark Services, Inc. is wholly owned by Aramark Intermediate HoldCo Corporation and Aramark Intermediate HoldCo Corporation is wholly owned by Aramark, a publicly traded company. No publicly held corporate owns 10% or more of the stock of Aramark. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Syring-Petrocchi, Tina) Modified text on 4/13/2022 (MMP). |
Filing 4 DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR - WILL REFILE RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Aramark, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Syring-Petrocchi, Tina) Modified text on 4/11/2022 (MMP). |
Filing 3 (Text-Only): Notice re: Non-Admitted AttorneyWe have received documents listing Claire C. Kueffner as counsel of record. If he or she wishes to be listed as an attorney of record in this case, he or she must be admitted to the bar of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (a), (b) and (c) or temporarily admitted pro hac vice in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (d) or (e).For more admissions information and forms, please see the Attorney Forms Section of the courts website at #www.mnd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms#. (ACH) |
Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Ann D. Montgomery per Civil (3rd, 4th - Civil Rights) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. Please use case number 22-cv-832 ADM/TNL. (ACH) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from State of Minnesota, District Court, County of Wright, Tenth Judicial District, case number 86-CV-22-1584 (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9429616) filed by Aramark Services, Inc.. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint, #2 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Syring-Petrocchi, Tina) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Calof v. Aramark Services, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Shelly Ann Calof | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Aramark, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Tina Syring-Petrocchi |
Represented By: | Matthew Beyer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.