Wingo v. 3M Company
John Wingo |
3M Company |
0:2022cv00993 |
April 20, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
John F Docherty |
Wilhelmina M Wright |
Elizabeth Cowan Wright |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ANSWER to Complaint filed by 3M Company. (Schmitt, Joseph) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian James Kluk on behalf of John Wingo. (Kluk, Brian) |
Filing 14 ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT OF RELATED CASES that 22-cv-996 (ECT/JFD) has been reassigned to Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright. Signed by Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright on 5/18/2022 and Judge Eric C. Tostrud on 5/20/2022(MMP) |
Filing 13 ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT OF RELATED CASES that 22-cv-994 WMW/TNL has been reassigned to Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright and Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. Signed by Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright on 5/17/2022.(MTB) |
Filing 12 ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT OF RELATED CASES that 22-cv-998 PJS/JFD has been reassigned to Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright. Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz and Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright on 5/11/2022.(CLK) |
Filing 11 ORDER on #8 Stipulation. 3M Company answer due 6/13/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 5/10/2022.(TJS) |
Filing 10 (Text-Only): Notice re: Non-Admitted AttorneyWe have received documents listing Maria S. Agostinho Campbell as counsel of record. If he or she wishes to be listed as an attorney of record in this case, he or she must be admitted to the bar of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (a), (b) and (c) or temporarily admitted pro hac vice in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (d) or (e).For more admissions information and forms, please see the Attorney Forms Section of the courts website at #www.mnd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms#. (KNK) |
Filing 9 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #8 Stipulation. (Schmitt, Joseph) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by 3M Company. Jointly Signed by John Wingo. (Schmitt, Joseph) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph G Schmitt on behalf of 3M Company. (Schmitt, Joseph) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by John Wingo. 3M Company served on 4/22/2022, answer due 5/13/2022. (Fiebiger, Rolf) |
Filing 5 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright recused. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty for all further proceedings. NOTE: the new case number is 22-CV-993 (WMW/JFD). Please use this case number for all subsequent pleadings Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 4/25/2022.(MMP) |
Filing 4 (Text-Only) NOTICE - Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright's Practice Pointers are available on the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota's #website. All parties are expected to be familiar with and adhere to these Practice Pointers, including Judge Wright's deviations from the Local Rules with respect to motion scheduling and briefing deadlines. (RJE) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to 3M Company. (CLK) |
Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright per Civil (3rd, 4th - Civil Rights) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. Please use case number 22-cv-993 WMW/ECW. (CLK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 3M Company (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9459233) filed by John Wingo. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Fiebiger, Rolf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.