Devisme et al v. Center City Housing Company et al
| Andrew Devisme and Anthony Devisme |
| Center City Housing Company and Duluth Minnesota Police Department |
| 0:2022cv01472 |
| June 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Leo I Brisbois |
| Eric C Tostrud |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiffs Andrew Devisme and Anthony Devisme's Complaint #1 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiffs' Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs #2 is DENIED as moot. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Eric C. Tostrud on 7/14/2022.(RMM)
|
|
Filing 2
Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Andrew Devisme. (MMP) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/27/2022: #1 Attached Page 2 of IFP Application) (MMP). Document QC'd on 6/27/2022 (MKB).
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Duluth Minnesota Police Department, Center City Housing Company filed by Andrew Devisme and Anthony Devisme. No summons requested. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud per 5th Division Civil Rights list, referred to Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Certificate of Service, #4 Envelope) (MMP) Document QC'd on 6/27/2022 (MKB).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
