Watts et al v. Walmart, Inc.
Precious Watts and K.W. |
Walmart, Inc. |
0:2022cv01675 |
June 28, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
John F Docherty |
Katherine M Menendez |
David T Schultz |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 23 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #22 Stipulation. (Pagel, Kirsten) |
Filing 22 STIPULATION FOR TEMPORARY STAY AND EXTENSION OF DEFENDANT'S TIME TO ANSWER, MOVE, OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT by Walmart, Inc.. Jointly Signed by Precious Watts and K.W.. (Pagel, Kirsten) |
Filing 21 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #16 Motion to Transfer/Change Venue. (Pagel, Kirsten) |
Filing 20 MEET and CONFER STATEMENT re #16 Motion to Transfer/Change Venue filed by Walmart, Inc..(Pagel, Kirsten) |
Filing 19 Declaration of Tracy Van Steenburgh in Support of #16 MOTION to Transfer/Change Venue filed by Walmart, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A-G)(Pagel, Kirsten) |
Filing 18 MEMORANDUM in Support re #16 MOTION to Transfer/Change Venue filed by Walmart, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Pagel, Kirsten) |
Filing 17 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION #16 MOTION to Transfer/Change Venue : Date and time to be determined. (Pagel, Kirsten) |
Filing 16 MOTION to Transfer/Change Venue filed by Walmart, Inc.. (Pagel, Kirsten) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Kirsten Pagel on behalf of Walmart, Inc.. (Pagel, Kirsten) |
|
|
Filing 12 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #11 Stipulation. (Van Steenburgh, Tracy) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint Stipulation for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint by Walmart, Inc.. Jointly Signed by Precious Watts and K.W. - Minor. (Van Steenburgh, Tracy) |
|
Filing 9 (Text-Only) NOTICE - Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright's Practice Pointers are available on the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota's #website. All parties are expected to be familiar with and adhere to these Practice Pointers, including Judge Wright's deviations from the Local Rules with respect to motion scheduling and briefing deadlines. (RJE) |
|
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Precious Watts, K.W.. Walmart, Inc. served on 6/29/2022, answer due 7/20/2022. (Shepherd, Jared) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Warren Postman. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-9605589 filed by K.W., Precious Watts. (Shepherd, Jared) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Ashley Keller. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-9605576 filed by K.W., Precious Watts. (Shepherd, Jared) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Ashley Barriere. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-9605550 filed by K.W., Precious Watts. (Shepherd, Jared) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Walmart, Inc. (MTB) |
Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Katherine M. Menendez per Civil (3rd/4th Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 22-cv-01675 KMM/DTS.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MTB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9602998) filed by Precious Watts, K.W.. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Shepherd, Jared) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.