Rogers et al v. Garland et al
| Colby A Rogers and Stacey R Rogers |
| Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou, Daniel M. Renaud, David L. Neal and David H. Wetmore |
| 0:2022cv01698 |
| June 30, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Leo I Brisbois |
| Katherine M Menendez |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by Ana H Voss on behalf of All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Voss, Ana)
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to Merrick Garland, Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, David L. Neal, Daniel M. Renaud, David H. Wetmore. cc: Colby A Rogers with Information Sheet (JGK)
|
Filing 2
FILED IN ERROR: REFILED. Summons Issued as to Merrick Garland, Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, David L. Neal, Daniel M. Renaud, David H. Wetmore. cc: Colby A Rogers with Information Sheet (JGK) Modified text on 7/1/2022 (kt).
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Merrick Garland, Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, David L. Neal, Daniel M. Renaud, David H. Wetmore (filing fee $402, receipt number 4-114505) filed by Stacey R Rogers, Colby A Rogers. Filer requests summons issued. Case assigned to Judge Kate M. Menendez per 6th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A-F, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (JGK) Document QC'd on 7/19/2022 (JGK).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.