Apex Brands, Inc. et al v. Jinhua Haode Technology Co., Ltd.
Plaintiff: Apex Brands, Inc. and Apex Tool Group, LLC
Defendant: Jinhua Haode Technology Co., Ltd.
Case Number: 0:2022cv01730
Filed: July 7, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: John F Docherty
Referring Judge: John R Tunheim
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 (Text-Only) ORDER granting #4 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney David Arthur Jackson for Apex Brands, Inc. and Apex Tool Group, LLC. Approved by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 7/12/2022. (KMO)
July 7, 2022 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Jinhua Haode Technology Co., Ltd. (MKB)
July 7, 2022 Filing 5 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge John R. Tunheim per Civil (3rd, 4th - Patent) list, referred to Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. Please use case number 22-cv-1730 (JRT/JFD).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MKB)
July 7, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney David A. Jackson. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-9621890 filed by Apex Brands, Inc., Apex Tool Group, LLC. (Micsky, Bradley)
July 7, 2022 Filing 3 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Apex Brands, Inc., Apex Tool Group, LLC. (Micsky, Bradley)
July 7, 2022 Filing 2 REPORT ON FILING OF PATENT/TRADEMARK ACTION (AO 120)(USPTO noticed with filing). (Micsky, Bradley)
July 7, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jinhua Haode Technology Co., Ltd. (filing fee $ 402, receipt number BMNDC-9621747) filed by Apex Brands, Inc., Apex Tool Group, LLC. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Exhibit(s) C, #4 Exhibit(s) D, #5 Exhibit(s) E, #6 Exhibit(s) F, #7 Exhibit(s) G, #8 Exhibit(s) H, #9 Exhibit(s) I, #10 Exhibit(s) J, #11 Exhibit(s) K, #12 Exhibit(s) L, #13 Exhibit(s) M, #14 Civil Cover Sheet) (Micsky, Bradley)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Apex Brands, Inc. et al v. Jinhua Haode Technology Co., Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Apex Brands, Inc.
Represented By: Nathan Louwagie
Represented By: Bradley William Micsky
Represented By: David Arthur Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Apex Tool Group, LLC
Represented By: Nathan Louwagie
Represented By: Bradley William Micsky
Represented By: David Arthur Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jinhua Haode Technology Co., Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?