Eagleson v. Torax Medical, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Charlene Eagleson
Defendant: Torax Medical, Inc. and Ethicon, Inc.
Case Number: 0:2022cv01832
Filed: July 21, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: David S Doty
Referring Judge: Patrick J Schiltz
2 Judge: David T Schultz
3 Judge: Elizabeth Cowan Wright
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 (Text-Only) ORDER/NOTICE: The parties agreed to have the Court issue a Scheduling Order based on the paper submissions. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 9/8/2022.(TMA)
September 8, 2022 Filing 14 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. Filed by Ethicon, Inc., Torax Medical, Inc.. Jointly Signed by Charlene Eagleson.(Pagel, Kirsten)
August 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER/NOTICE: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 9/6/2022. Pretrial Conference set for 9/15/2022 at 09:15 AM before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright.The parties may jointly request that no pretrial conference be held and that the pretrial scheduling order be issued based on the Rule 26(f) Report and confidential settlement letters. The joint request should be emailed along with the copy of the Rule 26(f). Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 8/25/2022. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(TMA)
August 10, 2022 Filing 12 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant Torax Medical, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ethicon, Inc. Ethicon, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, which is a publicly traded company. (Pagel, Kirsten) Modified text on 8/11/2022 (MMP).
August 10, 2022 Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Ethicon, Inc., Torax Medical, Inc.. (Pagel, Kirsten)
August 5, 2022 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Charlene Eagleson. Ethicon, Inc. served on 7/26/2022, answer due 8/16/2022. (Jones, Andrew)
August 5, 2022 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Charlene Eagleson. Torax Medical, Inc. served on 7/25/2022, answer due 8/15/2022. (Jones, Andrew)
July 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT OF RELATED CASES. This case is reassigned to Judge David S. Doty and Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright for all further proceedings. Chief Judge Patrick J. Schiltz, Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz no longer assigned to case. NOTE: the new case number is 22-cv-1832 DSD/ECW. Please use this case number for all subsequent pleadings.Signed by Judge David S. Doty on 7/25/2022. Signed by Chief Judge Patrick J. Schiltz and Judge John R. Tunheim on 7/26/2022. (MMG)
July 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 (Text-Only) ORDER granting #2 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Andrew A. Jones for Charlene Eagleson; granting #3 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Michael Sawicki for Charlene Eagleson. Approved by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 7/21/2022. (KMO)
July 21, 2022 Filing 6 EXHIBIT Exhibit A re #1 Complaint, filed by Charlene Eagleson. (Raso, Ashleigh)
July 21, 2022 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Ethicon, Inc., Torax Medical, Inc. (ACH)
July 21, 2022 Filing 4 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Patrick J. Schiltz per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 22-cv-1832 PJS/DTS.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (ACH)
July 21, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Michael Sawicki. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-9648896 filed by Charlene Eagleson. (Raso, Ashleigh)
July 21, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Andrew A. Jones. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-9648864 filed by Charlene Eagleson. (Raso, Ashleigh)
July 21, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ethicon, Inc., Torax Medical, Inc. (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9648801) filed by Charlene Eagleson. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Raso, Ashleigh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Eagleson v. Torax Medical, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charlene Eagleson
Represented By: Andrew A. Jones
Represented By: Ashleigh Raso
Represented By: Michael Sawicki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Torax Medical, Inc.
Represented By: Brandie L Morgenroth
Represented By: Kirsten Pagel
Represented By: Tracy J Van Steenburgh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc.
Represented By: Brandie L Morgenroth
Represented By: Kirsten Pagel
Represented By: Tracy J Van Steenburgh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?