Fairview Health Services v. Cigna Behavioral Health, Inc. et al
| Fairview Health Services |
| Cigna Behavioral Health, Inc., Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc., Home Depot Medical and Dental Plan and Home Depot Welfare Benefits Plan |
| 0:2022cv01910 |
| August 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Michael J Davis |
| John F Docherty |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER on #8 Stipulation for Extension of Time for Defendants to Move, Answer, or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint. Cigna Behavioral Health, Inc., Home Depot Medical and Dental Plan, Home Depot Welfare Benefits Plan, Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc. answer due 10/6/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 9/7/2022.(MTB)
|
| Filing 9 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #8 Stipulation,. (Santos, Margaret) |
| Filing 8 STIPULATION re #7 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, #1 Notice of Removal,, Stipulation for Extension of Time for Defendants to Move, Answer, or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint by Cigna Behavioral Health, Inc., Home Depot Medical and Dental Plan, Home Depot Welfare Benefits Plan, Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.. Jointly Signed by Fairview Health Services. (Santos, Margaret) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendants answer(s) due 9/6/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 8/10/2022. (TJS)
|
| Filing 6 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re Extending Defendants Time to Move, Answer, or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint #5 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer,. (Santos, Margaret) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal,, Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Move, Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint filed by Cigna Behavioral Health, Inc., Home Depot Medical and Dental Plan, Home Depot Welfare Benefits Plan, Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.. (Santos, Margaret) |
|
Filing 4
(Text-Only) ORDER granting #3 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Daniel Keenan Ryan for Cigna Behavioral Health, Inc., Home Depot Medical and Dental Plan, Home Depot Welfare Benefits Plan, Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc. Approved by Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty on 8/1/2022. (KMO)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Daniel K. Ryan. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-9669550 filed by Cigna Behavioral Health, Inc., Home Depot Medical and Dental Plan, Home Depot Welfare Benefits Plan, Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.. (Santos, Margaret) |
| Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Michael J. Davis per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. Please use case number 22-cv-1910 (MJD/JFD).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MKB) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL Defendants' Joint Notice of Removal from Hennepin County District Court (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9669138) filed by Home Depot Medical and Dental Plan, Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc., Cigna Behavioral Health, Inc., Home Depot Welfare Benefits Plan. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal #3 Civil Cover Sheet #4 Affidavit of Service) (Santos, Margaret) Modified text on 8/1/2022 (MKB). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
