Webber v. Metropolitan Council
| Timmy Webber |
| Metropolitan Council |
| 0:2022cv01943 |
| August 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Nancy E Brasel |
| David T Schultz |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12111 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
AMENDED ORDER/NOTICE FOR PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Parties are directed to Meet and Confer by 10/18/2022. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/18/2022. Pretrial Conference set for 10/25/2022 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 9E (MPLS) before Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 9/13/2022. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (TJB)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER/NOTICE FOR PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Parties are directed to Meet and Confer by 10/11/2022. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/11/2022. Pretrial Conference set for 10/18/2022 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 9E (MPLS) before Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 9/13/2022. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (TJB)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Laura Matson on behalf of Metropolitan Council. (Matson, Laura) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Metropolitan Council. (Ellingstad, Susan) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER on #5 Stipulation. Metropolitan Council answer due 9/6/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 8/30/2022. (TJB)
|
| Filing 6 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #5 Stipulation. (Ellingstad, Susan) |
| Filing 5 STIPULATION of Extension of Time for Defendant to Answer or Otherwise Plead by Metropolitan Council. Jointly Signed by Timmy Webber. (Ellingstad, Susan) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Timmy Webber (Hutton, Lee) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Metropolitan Council. (ABR) |
| Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Nancy E. Brasel per 3rd/4th Civil Rights list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 22-cv-1943 NEB/DTS.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (ABR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Timmy Webber (filing fee $ 402, receipt number BMNDC-9676612) filed by Timmy Webber. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Hutton, Lee) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Webber v. Metropolitan Council | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Timmy Webber | |
| Represented By: | Lee A Hutton, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Metropolitan Council | |
| Represented By: | Laura Matson |
| Represented By: | Susan E Ellingstad |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
