Allen v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
| Charles Allen |
| Metropolitan Life Insurance Company |
| 0:2022cv01944 |
| August 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| David T Schultz |
| Wilhelmina M Wright |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
(Text-Only) ORDER granting #6 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Daniel Keenan Ryan for Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Approved by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 8/24/2022. (KMO)
|
| Filing 8 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary reported for Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. (Gokhberg, Margarita) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company waiver sent on 8/8/2022, answer due 10/7/2022. (Gokhberg, Margarita) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Daniel K. Ryan. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-9716405 filed by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. (Gokhberg, Margarita) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Margarita Gokhberg on behalf of Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. (Gokhberg, Margarita) |
| Filing 4 (Text-Only) NOTICE - Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright's Practice Pointers are available on the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota's #website. All parties are expected to be familiar with and adhere to these Practice Pointers, including Judge Wright's deviations from the Local Rules with respect to motion scheduling and briefing deadlines. (RJE) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. (KNK) |
| Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Wilhelmina M. Wrightd per 3rd, 4th - Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 22-cv-1944 (WMW/DTS).Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (KNK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9676616) filed by Charles Allen. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bauer, Blake) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Allen v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Charles Allen | |
| Represented By: | Zachary Schmoll |
| Represented By: | Blake R Bauer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Metropolitan Life Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Daniel Keenan Ryan |
| Represented By: | Margarita Gokhberg |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
