Lukken v. Kijakazi
Cory James Lukken |
Kilolo Kijakazi |
0:2022cv01953 |
August 3, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Dulce J Foster |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES: Social Security Case Assignment Form Issued. Per #Local Rule 7.2, this form must be submitted to the clerk in paper on or before October 4, 2022. Please mail the completed form to:U.S. District Court for the District of MinnesotaClerks Office300 South Fourth Street, Suite 202Minneapolis, MN 55415 (CLK) |
Filing 7 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Due to the appointment of Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster, this case is reassigned to her. Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz is no longer assigned to the case. NOTE: the new case number is 22-cv-1953 DJF. Please use this case number for all subsequent filings. Scheduling orders entered before this case was reassigned will remain in effect unless otherwise ordered by the Court. If a previously scheduled proceeding conflicts with an event already on Magistrate Judge Foster's schedule, the parties will be contacted, and a new date and time agreed upon. Magistrate Judge Foster's #practice pointers are available on the Court's website. Please contact Magistrate Judge Foster's chambers, at 651-848-1900, for scheduling or other matters. (CLK) |
|
Filing 5 NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES: Social Security Case Assignment Form Issued. Per #Local Rule 7.2, this form must be submitted to the clerk in paper on or before the answer due date. Please mail the completed form to:U.S. District Court for the District of MinnesotaClerks Office300 South Fourth Street, Suite 202Minneapolis, MN 55415 (ABR) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Kilolo Kijakazi. (ABR) |
Filing 3 TEXT-ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz per Social Security List. Please use case number 22-cv-1953 DTS. (ABR) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Karl E. Osterhout. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-9677750 filed by Cory James Lukken. (Olson, Edward) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi (filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMNDC-9677743) filed by Cory James Lukken. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Olson, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lukken v. Kijakazi | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Cory James Lukken | |
Represented By: | Edward C. Olson |
Represented By: | Karl E. Osterhout |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi | |
Represented By: | Ana H Voss |
Represented By: | James D. Sides |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.