United States of America v. Zinda
| United States of America |
| Adolph Zinda |
| 0:2022cv01962 |
| August 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Dulce J Foster |
| David T Schultz |
| John R Tunheim |
| Taxes |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7401 IRS: Tax Liability |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Summons Issued as to Adolph Zinda. (KNK) |
| Filing 10 ENTERED IN ERROR, WILL REFILE. Summons Issued as to Adolph Zinda. (KNK) Modified text on 9/27/2022 (KNK). |
| Filing 9 DOCUMENT REFILED. SEE DOC. NO. #11 . Summons Reissued as to Adolph Zinda. (MMG) Modified text on 9/27/2022 (KNK). |
| Filing 8 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: Request to Clerk's Office to Issue Summons for Adolph Zinda. (Chang, William) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Withdrawal as Attorney (Suenram, Christopher) |
| Filing 6 DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR. Summons Reissued as to Adolph Zinda. (MMG) Modified text on 9/27/2022 (MMG). |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by William Chang on behalf of United States of America. (Chang, William) |
| Filing 4 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Due to the appointment of Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster, this case is reassigned to her. Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz is no longer assigned to the case. NOTE: the new case number is 22-cv-1962 JRT/DJF. Please use this case number for all subsequent filings. Scheduling orders entered before this case was reassigned will remain in effect unless otherwise ordered by the Court. If a previously scheduled proceeding conflicts with an event already on Magistrate Judge Foster's schedule, the parties will be contacted, and a new date and time agreed upon. Magistrate Judge Foster's #practice pointers are available on the Court's website. Please contact Magistrate Judge Foster's chambers, at 651-848-1900, for scheduling or other matters. (kt) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Adolph Zinda. (ACH) |
| Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge John R. Tunheim per Civil (3rd, 4th - Federal Tax Suits) list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 22-cv-1962 JRT/DTS.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (ACH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Adolph Zinda filed by United States of America. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Suenram, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Zinda | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Francis Suenram |
| Represented By: | William Chang |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Adolph Zinda | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
